Tuesday, 2 August 2011

Can mind go beyond the capacity of the brain?

   Today finished the movie, 'Paa'; that I started 2 days back (it’s another of my ideas, to rarely finish a movie in one sitting). 'Paa' is based on a rare condition called Progeria, an extremely rare genetic condition (1 in 8 million birth); where aging like symptoms are marked in relatively very early age. It’s a genetic condition that occurs as new mutation and is not inherited. [1]
   As I was watching the movie, there was a question in my mind all the time. Auro, the character played by Big B, is a 13 year old kid suffering from Progeria. As in Progeria, though Auro is a kid, he looks like a very old guy, got glasses (though it’s not rare to find 13 year old having glass), is bald, has wrinkled skin and looks probably like a old Lilliputian guy. But interestingly, he behaves just like any 13 year old would do. He hangs out with guys of his age, he does things, plays and talks like a 13 year old. Does this means that though he is aging physically, his brain seems to be growing at normal pace. For once I thought maybe it’s another Bollywood flick, where you are not supposed to think too much and apply too much logic. But later I started looking about Progeria to find if it really does has no affect on the pace of brain growth.
   I found few information about Progeria, but none that answered my question. I found characteristic symptoms include extreme short stature, early loss of hair, wrinkled skin, head disproportionately large for face, prominent scalp veins, low body weight, high-pitched voice, etc. that starts to show from 18-24 months. However, individuals retain normal mental and motor development. [2] [3] This is interesting to know; but then does it means that - though rest of physical body is deteriorating fast; brain which is also a physical lump of mass, does not deteriorates.
   One interesting finding is related to the abnormal formation of lamin A protein caused by mutation in the gene known as lamin A (LMNA). The LMNA gene codes for two proteins, lamin A and lamin C, that are known to play a key role in stabilizing the inner membrane of the cell's nucleus. Abnormal formation of this protein seems to destabilize the cell's nuclear membrane in a way that may be particularly harmful to tissues routinely subjected to intense physical force, such as the cardiovascular and musculoskeletal systems. [3] But then does this explains all the symptoms of Progeria, or maybe there is more than this.
   This does sound a good explanation for the causes of Progeria, but it does not seems to answer my question - does physical deterioration of brain occurs and if it does, why cognitive development is normal? So, I started my own thinking machine and came to following argument -
   We are born with this physical mass sitting on top of our body, which grows in size as we grow old; but note that no new neurons are formed other than the ones we are born with. Interesting fact is, as a new born, we have the most number of neurons that we will ever have in our life. Because as we grow right as infant, many of the earlier neurons die. So a person with Progeria, should also have same brain capacity to start with as a normal human would. So Progeria person is not disadvantaged by not having grown enough neuronal count, because as said, even though he has Progeria, he is born with more neuronal count than he will have later in his life.
   This physical lump, even when taken off a dead person, kept in some laboratory, showing no signs of life, doing no function and no neuronal firing, is still a brain. But when its working, its produces what we will call certain behavior, which in itself is the product of our mind. In simpler terms, mind is the product of the processing going on in the brain, that gets manifested into certain actions that we perceive as behavior.
   A person with Progeria has a disorder where his physical body is deteriorating faster than that of a normal human being. So I assume that the physical brain might also be deteriorating and maybe at the same pace. But does that physical deterioration of brain has any affect on his mind, or eventually to his behavior. Maybe yes, but probably not too much. Our mind is created out of the physical connections, i.e. synapses between the neurons. Those synapses are different in different person, and formed mainly by a person's own experiences. And so does behavior changes, as the experiences change, as person grow old (not considering the hormonal changes).
   In Progeria, the brain may be deteriorating, but mind is still evolving. Even in a normal person, as he gets old, his brain is definitely deteriorating, causing things like forgetfulness and hallucinations. But his mind might still be evolving, probably the reason why old guys are considered the most wise ones.




References

Sunday, 31 July 2011

When to decide to let your heart decide

I saw a movie today, 'Paa'; really really nice movie, but I am not writing a review of the movie. What I want to discuss, is a thought, that came to my mind as I was watching a scene in the movie. Vidya Balan, one of the protagonist, is with her mother, and having discussion if she should give birth to the child, considering she is now out of her relationship, would be a single mother and still has three years of education left. In this scene, she is portrayed as sobbing and counting all the problems she will face, if she gave birth to this child. While in response to her each argument, her mother just kept on asking - if she really wants this child or not. Finally her mother gave example of her own, how she raised Vidya when her father died while she was just two years old, and then her mother didn't even had any help, Vidya at least has her mother along to help her.

   Sometimes when its really hard to take a decision and choose between the options; its easier and often better to look inside for what we really want, rather than looking outside to see all the problems associated. Doing this way, it definitely makes it easier to take a decision, and channels all our thoughts towards how it can be achieved, rather than concentrating just over its problems. And of course one would rather be more happier to strive for and would put more efforts for something that person really wants from depths of heart.
   However there is a limitation to this principle, following one's heart sure make it easier to take a decision among choices as I said before, but its not always recommended in every situation. It might only be beneficial to follow, when all the options have same weight, or I must say are equally tempting; so much so that it becomes really difficult to decide which one to choose. However, for most of the important decisions, its not recommended to just follow one's heart, rather all aspects of the options needs to be given consideration.
   And final note, for decision that concerns those we love and care, just follow the heart, considering their wishes, for decisions that comes under the category of 'KFP', "Kee Farak Painda (hai)", meaning "What difference does it make". Whereas when deciding something that would come under the category of 'BFP', "Bahut Farak Painda (hai)", meaning "It does make lot of difference", even if it makes some of the loved ones gloomy for a while, just follow the mind, consider the logic, what it thinks is more feasible and rational. If the decision taken is well thought over, even if it makes few gloomy for a while, chances are they would appreciate and be thankful for it, in the end of the day.

Saturday, 23 July 2011

Patriotic or Matriotic

  
Patriotic [1] [2] [3] [4] is a masculine word, comes from the same Greek root as of the word paternal, "pater" meaning "of one's father".
   We Indians regard our country not as father, rather as a mother nation. In our National Song, when we say
"Vande Mataram" [5], it literally means - "I bow to thee, Mother Nation".
   Then is it right to use the word patriotic, or rather we should have a new word, lets say Matriotic, from the root "mater" meaning "of one's mother".
Any thoughts?

PS: Please respond to poll and comment.

Patriotic or Matriotic?

Wednesday, 20 July 2011

If time travel in past be possible, would we be able to make changes?

Thoughts on Episode 3 - "Is Time Travel Possible" of Season 1 of "Through the Wormhole" by Morgan Freeman.

   If there be a time travel machine through which we did travel in past, would we be able to grab things or to say make any changes to them?
   In my view, traveling in past is not the same thing as being part of it. Whenever we see in far distances in universe we actually are traveling in past. When we see Andromeda Galaxy, nearest spiral galaxy to Milky way, 2.5 million light years away from Earth, we are actually looking Andromeda as it was 2.5 million years in past.
   To explain this, lets consider this case - It takes light 8 min from Sun to get to our eyes on Earth. That means every time we see Sun, its 8 min in past. And if Sun disappears now, we will realize that 8 min later. Lets say, we design a robotic arm that can extend from earth all the way to Sun in just 1 min and tries to grab it. If at this very moment the Sun disappears, but because of time it takes for light to travel the distance, we will still see the Sun. Now if we try to grab the sun at this very moment, when our fictional robotic hand would reach near the Sun, we wont feel like it grabbed onto anything. But when we look towards the Sun, we will still be able to see it. Not just for moment, but for whole 8 min we would see the Sun, but wont be able to grab onto anything.
   I think, even if we did travel in past, it would be like being in a Virtual Reality simulation, a perfect Virtual Reality, where you cannot infer artificial as not being real, but when you would try to grab something, you wont be able to get a hold of it.